136. Special leave to appeal by the Supreme Court.
- (1) Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter, the Supreme Court may, in its discretion, grant special leave to appeal from any judgment, decree, determination, sentence or order in any cause or matter passed or made by any court or tribunal in the territory of India.
- (2) Nothing in clause (1) shall apply to any judgment, determination, sentence or order passed or made by any court or tribunal constituted by or under any law relating to the Armed Forces.
A normal mattered of cheeting say that 6 accused involved in in it saying that the will allot a room in mahda and the main a accused have beeing dealing with the complener and after two years he fills a fir against all the 6 accused and out of six police arrest the maine man and after that one by police arrested 5 of them in six months and all the five are out on bail but 6 man approached the court for AB but the session court and the horn able high court reject bail of the sixth accused saying that when 5 were in jail for some time then the sixth accused must be go to jail and after that he will get the bail and one more thing all the 5 accused were not in jail for six months police that arrested one by one in six months some were for one or two months only the maine man was in jail for six months and the charsheet has been filled by the police and know there is no reason that police want custody in that case were the investigation has been completed is there is the reason that seppely 5 were in jail for short term the sixth man should be in jail
This is my question